<HTML>In a message dated 4/26/02 7:59:25 AM Central Daylight Time, jkanter@rollingball.com (Jason Kanter) writes: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">> People like me who use unequal temperaments are often accused of imposing our > own taste on the public ...  How is Susan's explanation of why she only > likes and uses ET any different? Susan doesn't seem angry, and she's not giving a tirade. Big difference. </BLOCKQUOTE> Right.  My post was an angry, violent tirade and I go around abusing everybody and imposing my own ridiculous, convoluted, twisted ideas on everybody.  It drives everyone away and is a disgrace to the entire profession.  I should be kicked off this list and out of PTG, be sued for libel, slander and violating common law practice.  Once that is done, the world will be able to return to peaceful bliss and harmony, of which ET stands as a shining example and symbol. Now that that's out of the way, what about the real question:  isn't the arbitrary use of ET in fact imposing a specific set a values upon the public without their informed consent? Bill Bremmer RPT Madison, Wisconsin <A HREF="http://www.billbremmer.com/">Click here: -=w w w . b i l l b r e m m e r . c o m =-</A> </HTML>