<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; =
charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>One other comment. When I first got the =
SAT I just
kind of used it without really checking as I went. I found out =
very
quickly that if I wanted the tuning to be where I really wanted that I =
had to
check intervals aurally as I tuned. The SAT got me right there =
very
quickly, and not having to play octaves to tune notes going up and down =
allowed
me to tune with very firm blows (I think it's better to tune hard and =
check
soft) without stressing out my hands and wrists. I found it =
improved my
tuning stability, or at least made it easier to achieve stability with =
less
physical stress. Nevertheless, I always check intervals going up =
and down,
at least octaves, thirds, tenths and fifths. But this can be done =
very
quickly as a check and doesn't slow down the process much. I find =
that I
often make small compromises either due to calculation anomalies or =
measurement
confusion. Most of the time these compromises are from the =
5th octave
up and/or in the bass. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>David Love </FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com
href="mailto:mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com">Farrell</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=pianotech@ptg.org
href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> October 21, 2001 11:11 =
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: more on this =
temperament
thing</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>I would sure like to hear more on this topic. As a tuner still on =
a steep
learning curve, I wonder just what I should be doing with my octaves,
but I find that the SAT III is either right where I wish it to =
be, or
sometimes I do find that it seems to have calculated a tuning with too =
much
stretch, and I have to enter negative numbers in the DOB to slow the =
beating
down - occasionally quite a bit.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Terry Farrell <SPAN =
id=__#Ath#SignaturePos__></SPAN> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=davidlovepianos@earthlink.net
href="mailto:davidlovepianos@earthlink.net">David Love</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=pianotech@ptg.org
href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, October 21, =
2001 11:25
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: more on this =
temperament
thing</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>My experience suggests that C8 at 43+ is not a
conservative stretch but a fairly healthy one. To my ear, I =
usually
reduce the stretch (on the SATIII via the DOB). =
On concert
grands I seem to prefer it a bit under 40. On =
smaller
grands and uprights, in the mid 30's. Of course the =
general
scaling does make a difference. But generally I find the =
standard
setting on a SATIII over stretches. I am curious what =
other
people find.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>David Love</FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- =
</DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=dm.porritt@verizon.net =
href="mailto:dm.porritt@verizon.net">David
M. Porritt</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=pianotech@ptg.org
href="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> October 21, 2001 7:40 =
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: more on this =
temperament
thing</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Bill:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>You've talked quite a bit of your "tempered octaves" but as =
one who
has seen everything from 2:1 octaves to outrageously stretched =
octaves I
don't know what kind of stretch you're talking about. Could =
you give
us some numbers so we can know what you mean by tempered =
octaves?
</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>For example, when I tune a Steinway D my C6 is stretched to =
5.06, C7
is 16.11, and C8 is 43.84. This is what I consider a =
conservative
tuning. What kind of numbers do you get? On any piano, =
just
measure your C6, 7, & 8 and tell us what model piano it is, =
and how it
stretches with your tempered octaves. That would be very
informative.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>dave<BR><FONT face=Arial size=2>*********** REPLY =
SEPARATOR
***********<BR><BR>On 10/21/01 at 7:19 AM Billbrpt@AOL.COM
wrote:</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 =
2px solid"><FONT
face=arial,helvetica><FONT size=2>In a message dated =
10/21/01 6:07:55 AM
Central Daylight Time, davidlovepianos@earthlink.net (David =
Love)
writes: <BR><BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: =
#0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"
TYPE="CITE">That being said, if the pianist needs an altered =
tuning to
create excitement, he should practice =
more.</BLOCKQUOTE><BR></FONT><FONT
lang=0 face=Arial color=#000000 size=3 =
FAMILY="SANSSERIF"><BR>It's
always been my belief, as a piano technician that the better =
prepared
the piano, the better equipped the artist is. Remember =
that I have
not advocated *HT* as such for Jazz. To you, this implies
*altered* tuning which means something quite noticeably =
different and
thus creates an *interference* with what you do rather than =
provide an
enhancement. <BR><BR>I don't know if you can or have tried my =
EBVT but
as I have designed it (with Tempered Octaves), it is meant to =
enhance
your playing, not shock or disturb your musical sensibilities. =
It
is meant to provide definition, texture and clarity, not weird, =
jarring
and shocking dissonances. If the EBVT is still to =
*altered* for
you, I believe you might benefit from the Marpurg (also with my =
Tempered
Octaves system). I will give your piano an uncanny clean, =
crisp
and clear sound but absolutely will not create any distinction =
between
keys. <BR><BR></FONT><FONT lang=0 face=Arial color=#000000 =
size=2
FAMILY="SANSSERIF">Bill Bremmer RPT <BR>Madison, =
Wisconsin</FONT><FONT
size=2 =
Arial></BLOCKQUOTE></FONT></FONT><PRE>_____________________________
David M. Porritt
dporritt@mail.smu.edu
Meadows School of the Arts
Southern Methodist University
Dallas, TX 75275
_____________________________</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE=
></BODY></HTML>