<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; = charset=windows-1252"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2719.2200" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT><FONT face=Arial = size=2>    Well, Alan, unless I'm wrong (In which case I'm sure I'll hear about = it), in the area of the upper temperament, the difference between A440 and A441 is approxiamately 4 cents, so 442 would be eight cents sharp. </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>    That being said, one = cycle at A0 would be about 64 cents at the fundemental level, according to Jim = Coleman Sr. So I suppose that one cycle per second at the top of the piano would = probably be a fraction of a cent. Just this month he mentioned that, and remarked = that it gave a whole new light on lower bass tuning, and quibbling over a few = tenths of a cent. </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>    PLEASE, LET'S NOT = HAVE THE MATH SPELLED OUT IN A WHOLE NEW THREAD. I'm sure that some would find it = interesting, but Calculus puts me to sleep. </FONT></DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">Can someone clearly and simply explain the math involved in correlating<BR>absolute pitch (in Hz) to pitch relationships (in cents)?<BR><BR><BR>Alan Barnard<BR>Salem, = MO<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>