<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2 FAMILY="SERIF" FACE="Times New Roman" LANG="0">In a message dated 12/18/2002 4:03:28 PM Pacific Standard Time, sbellieu@mindspring.com writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">Subj: <B>Re: Bridgetop Extravaganza Revisited </B><BR>
Date: 12/18/2002 4:03:28 PM Pacific Standard Time<BR>
From: <A HREF="mailto:sbellieu@mindspring.com">sbellieu@mindspring.com</A><BR>
Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A><BR>
To: <A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A><BR>
<I>Sent from the Internet </I><BR>
<BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">Steve</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SERIF" FACE="Times New Roman" LANG="0"> Could you share how it is you're measuring 1.5 degrees of bearing on the bass and with what. If the rear string length was 8 inches( possible on a D) 8 Times .026=.208 or (1.5 degrees) of distance bearing . Considering this bass bridge has no cantilever I don't mind seeing this at the top end of the bridge but I'd like to see .05 degrres in the mono section. That being said I've seen D basses set up with more than that that sounded great and ones with nominal bearing or none that sounded somewhat weak. Where's the beef?<BR>
What's really there has or will come to light with the strings off no doubt.<BR>
Dale Erwin</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
Greg,</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"> It's definitely quartersawn. I don't think it's a candidate for recapping for two reasons. The board is dead flat across the bass bridge and lower tenor bridge (as measured from the top and confirmed on the bottom). Also I have learned the piano was purchased by the client new some 16 yrs ago. I have no intention of condemning this piano. It sounded ok before. Not spectacular bass but I have heard much worse. I'm anticipating tight new bridge pins are going to contribute to tonal improvement up higher.</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"> I'm wondering about the bearing in the bottom of the piano. How it was originally set. Strung it showed a full 1.5 deg across the bass bridge and almost nothing on the bottom two feet of the tenor bridge.(also no front bearing in both of these locations) Is this what flattened out the tail ? If I relieve some of the bearing across the bass bridge will this improve the situation? I'm used to seeing older pianos with little bearing on the bass bridge. Opinions?</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
<BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">Steve Bellieu</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SERIF" FACE="Times New Roman" LANG="0"><BR>
</FONT></HTML>