<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> <html>   vanbrussel wrote: basically that he didnt like this stuff and that in turn stimulated a whole bunch of back and forthing about another ridiculous, misunderstood out of context segment of a posting that had actually nothing at all to do with preaching or spreading the gosple but was an appropriate response to another posting that was a takeoff on a previous thread that was so far removed from the particulars of this present absurdity that it makes the black orange of Stobblerkopf look like a pedigree pansy. Just so you all know... this came as a respons to a posting I made in regards to Ron N's posting about the Climate, overindulgence, prosperity thread that Del put up a while back. I pointed out that Rons apparent resignation to the futility of human endeavor was a particularilly Christian point of view which stimulated Chris to take up the defence of the faith... misplaced really but thats besides the point. If any one then is to blame for this popping up I suppose its me. So shoot me and be done with it so we can all go on playing. :) <blockquote TYPE=CITE> <blockquote>Christopher Witmer, in a recent post, quoted John 3:16; "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved." -- John 3:16-17</blockquote> </blockquote> -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. Bergen, Norway <A HREF="mailto:Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no">mailto:Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no</A>  </html>