<html>
At 11:01 AM 9/12/2005 +0200, you wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite>. Many non tuners read the journal
and indeed this list. And very many indeed are going to react as
myself and obviously significant numbers of other techs. I do not
as a member of this organization subscribe whatsoever to the attitude
relfected therein, nor do I feel the Presidents column was at all an
appropriate place for this kind of thing to be taken up to begin
with.<br><br>
Richard Brekne<br>
</blockquote><br>
Face it, Ric. Many tuners don't read their <i>Journal.</i>
"Many" non-tuners is questionable, or at least relative. It's
probably "not-so-many", when you get down to it. And the fact
that you don't agree, or "subscribe whatsoever" is kind of the
point, don't you think, of an article that has a main theme of asking the
question "What's Better??" It worked, basically, in that a few
techs have responded with what they think (or do) is "better".
With concern over non-techs and non-members seeing a "face" of
the org, perhaps a more appropriate place for this discussion would be
over on ptg-l. <br><br>
Remember the guy that was travelling a curvy mountain road and had a
near-miss with a lady coming around a curve. As they passed, she yelled
"PIG!". He was leaning over his shoulder, calling her all kinds
of nasty names, as he rounded the curve and hit the 400 pound hog square
on.<br><br>
With all due respect,<br>
Guy<br>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
None learned the art of archery from me<br>
Who did not make me, in the end, the target.<br>
Saadi of Shiraz (c. 1200 AD)</html>