<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT COLOR="#000040" SIZE=2 FAMILY=
="SERIF" FACE="Times New Roman" LANG="0">In a message dated 8/23/2003 =
7:04:54 AM Pacific Daylight Time, yardbird@vermontel.net writes:<BR>
Bill writes<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT=
: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000"=
style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="A=
rial" LANG="0"> The only reason to adjust key <BR>
inertia would be in meeting the requirements of top action inertia. <BR>
So from a design standpoint, I'd say that top action inertia is the <BR>
one to pay attention to. Key inertia is the tail on the dog which <BR>
wags when its's happy with the weight of the rest of the dog.<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fff=
fff" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000040" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3=
FAMILY="SERIF" FACE="Times New Roman" LANG="0"> &nbs=
p; Hi Bill<BR>
I agree and the only way I can th=
ink of to effectively overcome the problem and the key inertia is to lengthe=
n the key to get better leverage. A case in point are the old stwy pla=
yers with the long keys. No it's not a practical solution but in theory it w=
ould increase leverage, reduce the amount of counter balancing lead weight.<=
BR>
Dale</FONT></HTML>