<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2 FAMILY="SERIF" FACE="Times New Roman" LANG="0">In a message dated 12/21/2002 9:39:50 AM Pacific Standard Time, RNossaman@cox.net writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">Subj: <B>Re: M&H B </B><BR>
Date: 12/21/2002 9:39:50 AM Pacific Standard Time<BR>
From: <A HREF="mailto:RNossaman@cox.net">RNossaman@cox.net</A><BR>
Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A><BR>
To: <A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A><BR>
<I>Sent from the Internet </I><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
>> Ron<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> The Mason B is 5 ft 4 " and has eleven mono-chords and I think 26 <BR>
>bass notes so its not exactly an A clone but not a bad piano either. Has <BR>
>a big sound for its size.<BR>
<BR>
A nice piano, I thought, allowing for it's condition. I wonder why there <BR>
aren't more of them around.<BR>
<BR>
Ron N<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SERIF" FACE="Times New Roman" LANG="0"><BR>
Ron<BR>
Me too. Perhaps it's the low numbers of Mason & Hamlins built overall. Only 90 something thousand over how many years? It seems that there are More Mason As out there than any thing.<BR>
Dale </FONT></HTML>