<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
I gotta agree with David here. That being said, if you know your tuning
theory and a bit about how ETD's calculate tunings, you can indeed use
a Peterson to do an outstanding job. But dont expect the device to do much
for you besides telling you if you are right on any particular frequency
or not. For most tuners, the excersise in learning to tune this way would
no doubt be a valuable one. Tunelab 97 is also very easy to use in this
fashion so if you already have a portable PC I would suggest rethinking
the Peterson decision.
<p>BTJMO
<br>RicB
<p>"David M. Porritt" wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE> TuneLab Pocket is only $340.00 and the cost
of a pocket PC. Together they'd be in that price range, and it is
a much more competent system. dave
<br><font face="Arial"><font size=-1>On 2/3/2003 at 10:09 PM RCzekay@aol.com
wrote:</font></font>
<blockquote
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid"><font face="Arial"><font size=-1>Thanks
for your response,</font></font>
<p><font face="Arial"><font size=-1>The PT490ST sells for $600.00. I think
I will go with it.</font></font></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>--
<br>Richard Brekne
<br>RPT, N.P.T.F.
<br>UiB, Bergen, Norway
<br><A HREF="mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no">mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no</A>
<br><A HREF="http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html">http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html</A>
<br> </html>