<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=2>In a message dated 8/29/02 8:49:48 AM Central Daylight Time, pierre.gevaert@belgacom.net (Gevaert Pierre) writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Btw, I'm one of the users of your regulations on the VT and of EBVT, and the
<BR>tunings sounds verry nice.
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">
<BR>Not that being skeptical would be in my best interest, I still wonder how close these attempts at the EBVT are coming. I suspect that it is more like a "representative" Victorian than what I do.
<BR>
<BR>Do the results create:
<BR>
<BR>F3-C4 pure?
<BR>C4-F4 pure?
<BR>F3-Bb pure?
<BR>Bb3-F4 pure?
<BR>F#3-C#4 pure?
<BR>G#3-C#4 pure?
<BR>
<BR>F3-A3, G3-B3, G3-E4 and C4-E4 all beating exactly the same, 6 beats per second?
<BR>
<BR>A3-C#4 and Bb3-D4 beating exactly the same, about 9 beats per second?
<BR>
<BR>G3-D4 and A3-D4 tempered exactly the same, about 2 beats per second?
<BR>
<BR>Ab3-Eb4 and Bb3-Eb4 tempered exactly the same, very little, less than in ET?
<BR>
<BR>These are the features of my EBVT. No other Victorian style temperament is like this. Also, the way the octaves are stretched cannot be duplicated with the Verituner, from what I understand.
<BR>
<BR>I am, however interested in what really is being produced here and would like to hear it.
<BR>
<BR>Bill Bremmer RPT
<BR>Madison, Wisconsin
<BR> <A HREF="http://www.billbremmer.com/">Click here: -=w w w . b i l l b r e m m e r . c o m =-</A> </FONT></HTML>