<HTML><HEAD>
<META charset=US-ASCII http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; cha=
rset=US-ASCII">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fffff=
f">
<DIV>In a message dated 11/8/2004 10:34:48 AM Eastern Standard Time, marc_av=
ery@hotmail.com writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue =
2px solid"><FONT face=Arial>None of your comments have anything to do with=
the true essence of what I'm <BR>trying to say.</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The problem with what you're trying to say is that it is built on a fou=
ndation of conspiracy theories and propaganda fed to you by the DNC. </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue =
2px solid"><FONT face=Arial><BR>And besides... CBS didn't try to "pu=
ll anything". </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV>Well, yes they did. They tried to do Bush in with a late in the game sm=
ear campaign based on forged documents, outright lies, information that had =
even been rejected 4 years ago by the king of smear, Algore. When Algore won=
't touch it, it *has* to be bad. Then they planned to air a false story abou=
t the weapons cache, and would have done so if the story hadn't leaked out f=
orcing them to go with it early. Their intent was to affect the elections wi=
th unproven scandal spit out too late for anyone to refute it. As it turned =
out, that story too was false. If you can't see that CBS blatantly attempted=
to do harm to Bush during an election, something is seriously wrong.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue =
2px solid"><FONT face=Arial>They're owned by one of <BR>the cheapest cost =
cutting broadcasting corporations around. Their CEO and <BR>board of d=
irectors are about as right wing as you can get. </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV>Now that's a real joke, Marc. The CEO and board of directors at CBS are=
so far left they ought to be named Marx.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue =
2px solid"><FONT face=Arial>Whitewater a <BR>scandal? Give me a brea=
k. Enron was a scandal. </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV>Fine. Whitewater involved the Clintons, Enron involved no president. Bu=
t if you want to insist on using Enron as a case in point, perhaps you'd lik=
e to go on the record acknowledging that the criminal activity at Enron happ=
ened before Bush took office, only coming to light right after he became pre=
sident. That means the bulk of the criminal activity happened while Clinton =
was in office. I don't think you can blame either president for what happene=
d at Enron. But if you insist on doing so, at least have the intellectual ho=
nesty to lay it at the feet of the president who was in office when the crim=
es were being committed instead of the one in office when their house of car=
ds that took years to accomplish fell.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue =
2px solid"><FONT face=Arial>Ask anyone who worked <BR>there and lost every=
thing. Can you honestly say the same for Whitewater?<BR>Believe me, if=
the twin towers hadn't been attacked, Bush would have never <BR>got off his=
butt either.</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV>Well, you're off the standard DNC talking points there, Marc. Or have y=
ou forgotten that the DNC yelled the conspiracy theory from the rooftop=
s that Bush came into office planning to start a war in the middle east? Whi=
ch way do you want this - you can't have it both ways.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue =
2px solid"><FONT face=Arial><BR>He ignored all the CIA information about a=
possible attack. </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV>Sorry, but that's not factual. You need to study up on that one, Marc. =
The briefing was just one more like many others that came to the president, =
even when Clinton was in office. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>