"New" Hamburg Hammers

[jolly roger]

Greetings Eric and Lawrence,
                                            Now I'm truly embarrassed
getting you two fine gentlemen mixed up. Thank's for setting the record
straight.  And thank you for the tour of CCM, and other places, it was one
of the high lights of the convention.
Both pianos are well above the norm,  and you are to be commended for your
fine work.
Regards to you both.
Roger



At 07:41 AM 4/16/01 -0400, you wrote:
>Roger-
>
>Thanks for the kind words.  However, Eric Wolfley is the one who regulated 
>29 and installed the Stanwood touchweight modifications and new Renner 
>hammers and voiced and regulated and listened and regulated and voiced and 
>listened and voiced and regulated then you listened.  Then I get credit.  I 
>like this job!
>
>Lawrence Becker, RPT
>College-Conservatory of Music
>University of Cincinnati
>
>At 12:35 AM 4/15/01 -0500, you wrote:
>>Hi Don,
>>             I was in Cincinnati last fall for the Ohio state convention,
>>Lawrence Becker hosted a group of CAUT participant's to share  ideas.
>>His two prize D's One about a year old, the other a 1929 rebuild with full
>>Stanwood treatment and very high strike weight. Wapin bridge, and Renner
>>hammers.
>>Both pianos sounded wonderful,  Obviously Lawrence showing off a little.
>><G>.  Would'nt we all in front of our peers?  Beautiful work.
>>We had a grad student play the same pieces on the two D's and a Bossy.
>>(Also ran)
>>Interesting results.  Most of use preferred the tonal pallet and range of
>>the the old rebuilt D,  from out in the hall.  My immediate comment to
>>Lawrence, not knowing which was which, " That is not steinway hammers". He
>>just smiled before telling us of the changes.
>>Talking to the Grad student, however, she much preferred the New D. Several
>>in the group played both pianos, and some changed their minds, once they
>>sat at the instruments and got connected.
>>A very worth while exercise, and very illuminating about the human
>>connection of tone and touch.
>>I hope Lawrence is reading this and will expand on his observations.  But
>>you should exchange notes with him,  we could all benifit from the dialogue.
>>For my money the German hammers had a greater tonal pallet, with that clear
>>singing translucent French romantic sound at ppp, so elusive with juiced
>>hammers. Not sure if I'm describing the tone that well.
>>Please keep us informed of the chapter results.
>>Regards roger
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>At 11:59 AM 4/12/01 -0400, you wrote:
>> >Hi John,
>> >
>> >In January I put a set of Hamburg's on our 22 year old D. (this piano
>> >was restrung last August, used GC bass strings) Since then, every guest
>> >artist and one piano faculty member have chosen this piano over our 3
>> >year old NY D. In all fairness to the NY, it is in need of hammer filing
>> >etc. but due to usage that has not been possible this semester. The
>> >Hamburg hammers have a very nice clarity but less of a tonal palate than
>> >the NY. The pianists that have used the older D preferred the clarity
>> >and punch. I plan to work on the NY after commencement and then have a
>> >chapter meeting here to compare the two and analyze the tonal
>> >characteristics of each. Should be fun.
>> >
>> >I also but a set of Hamburg's on an old B in the practice rooms. Same
>> >tonal situation as above. The students scrambled to sign out that room.
>> >Go figure.
>> >
>> >Don McKechnie
>> >Ithaca College
>> >
>