Greetings, Ted writes inre1/4 comma meantone << <snip> Has it occured to many people that its underlying philosophy has much in common with equal temperament, as the 'usable' keys are all alike, so key color is not really an issue, compared to the just major thirds and slow beating major sixths.<< I fear not. It hasn't occurred to many people that 1/4 comma exists, much less its particular qualities. Among the musicians I have both banged heads and agreed with, much knowledge of 1/4 C seems restricted to its, um... restriction. The wolf is the most easily discerned feature and often signals the end of serious consideration of the tuning's use. I personally think an understanding of1/4C should be had at the earliest stages of a pianist's training. Unfortunately, we often only get a chance to open the door a little just as they finish their schooling, ( thus the need for a really focussed course for piano majors). I am going to try to develope this further at Vanderbilt, but faculties are often a bit unsettled by talk of changing any intonational parameters, so I proceed caut iously . Many techs do recognize the smoothness of the thirds, but here it seems like a strange familiarity shows itself. As Ted points out, the "sameness" of the keys in MT is not dissimilar to the "sameness" found in ET. That the one has thirds of 0 tempering and the other wide by 13.7 is profound once pointed out, but the lack of tonal change between keys is a familiar concept. That was the reasoning for following our MT with a fairly strong WT on the 6Degree recording. I was hoping to present tempering in an attractive way, so we kept the same key (D) for the first two pieces. After the MT Scarlatti, the opening chord of the Mozart makes the beating as evident as I could imagine. I think the sameness in the thirds contributes to a sedative sound, and much baroque music seems sedative to me. >>I must confess to some mystification also to the idea of 1/7th. comma meantone. Surely there can be no such thing, as meantone has always meant the division of the just major third into two (mean)tones rather than the major tone with a ratio of 8:9 and the minor tone ratio of 9:10 which added together comprise the just major third. >> I have assumed that the designation came from the wolfish nature of the 1/6, 1/7,etc. Back to that strongest distinguishing feature thing, perhaps. The case can be made that reducing the wolf from 41 to 31 and finally around 28 cents increases the utility of the notes in passing, though they still sound harsh in vertical constructions. I don't know enough about the history of music's evolution during this particular time, but would like to hear more 1650-1720 keyboard music in the the various versions of meantones that have been published. Perhaps their utility would reveal itself if it could be found that music was "improved" by one or another. Regards, Ed Foote Vanderbilt (I was fortunate to take a one day car trip up through Banff area last fall to Lake Louise, and how anybody can get any work done amidst scenery like that is beyond me!)
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC