"building blocks"

[Wimblees@aol.com]

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 6/27/03 10:28:59 AM Central Daylight Time, 
Cramer@BrandonU.CA writes:

> Meanwhile, I would like to provoke my valued CAUT colleagues to do
> everything possible to entrench the credentials of RPT in your institutions,
> to register endorsement of the new guidelines "yesterday or sooner" and to
> prevail upon all your colleagues to do the same.
> 

While I am a great believer and supporter of the PTG, I am not sure if a 
school can require someone to the a member of the PTG, much less be an RPT. Yes, 
the being an RPT will show on paper that a tuner has the basic skills to be a 
piano tuner, there are many technicians out there that have the skills of an 
RPT, but have  for one reason or aother decided not to be a member of the PTG. 

The following might be outside the scope of this forum, but instead of urging 
schools to hire just RPT members of the PTG, should the PTG consider allowing 
non members to take the exam? (Charge three or four time the fee).

Wim 

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/34/84/64/78/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--