---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment I don't know much about the other ones except what I've heard others=20 say. But I love my SAT III. You'd be hard pressed to give me a=20 sufficient reason to trade it for one of the others. It fits snugly=20 into a small compartment in my rather compact tool case, and will sit=20 almost any place on any piano you need for it to sit. I'm told the=20 tuning scales (or curves) are now different from earlier models, and=20 you can see this by comparing newly calculated tunings with tunings=20 from the library using the same numbers (the library tunings were=20 calculated on older SATs). The new tuning has been superior every time=20= I've compared them. I love the pitch correction feature, and use it on=20= maybe half my tunings. You can have your instruments which have to be charged daily. I can't=20= imagine enough difference in tuning quality to make up for the hassle=20 of daily charging. Today, I tuned 4 pianos after the low battery light=20= came on. Probably could have kept on going, but was finished for the=20 day. Jeff On Saturday, November 1, 2003, at 11:58 AM, Dave Forman wrote: > Caut, > > I=92m considering buying a new tuner, and I=92m looking for advice. = I=92m=20 > looking at the SAT, Cybertuner, and Verituner. What are your=20 > experiences with these, which do you prefer, and why. I=91ve used an = SAT=20 > I for 12 years, and I=92m wondering if the newer devices do give a=20 > better tuning. > > =A0 > > Dave Forman > > WestminsterChoirCollegeofRiderUniversity > > Jeff Tanner, RPT School Of Music University of South Carolina= ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 1860 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/51/63/72/3d/attachment.bin ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC