This is a multipart message in MIME format ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Hi Roger, I enjoyed your class last week. Phil Ford just delivered a= SD-10? 1981...it acually only says SD on the plate...he= installed Ronsen Wurzen hammers and the piano is very nice. He= lacquered the top only. I do have a slightly weak spot at the= top of the 1st treble section that I might lacquer...sort of a= continuance of his high treble lacquering. All in all the piano= has plenty of everything, but I'm still getting to know. David Ilvedson Original message From: Roger Jolly To: College and University Technicians Received: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:22:16 -0600 Subject: Re: [CAUT] SD-10 duplex question Hi Jeff, Try the Ronsen, Werzen felt. It will be very= close. They were a softer cold pressed hammer, usually juiced= in the top and bottom octave. Use 4:1 lacquer to lacquer= thinner. Let harden for 2 or 3 days before further voicing for= best results. Regards Roger At 09:43 AM 2/17/2005, you wrote: On Thursday, February 17, 2005, at 10:35 AM, Roger Jolly wrote: To work well, the hammer needs to be a bit softer and more= flexible in the shoulder. To be quite honest, I have no= problems working with this system. Regards Roger Nor do I. I much prefer the tone of our 1982 SF to the tone of= the 1994's. It's much easier to tune, but that may be in the= hammers. I'd love to know what those earlier hammers were, so I= can replace the newer ones with something similar. I can't= stand the sound these 1994 hammers produce. Jeff _______________________________________________ caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/07/61/7b/28/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC