I'm not even sure if I want to tell this. It's a little embarrassing, but had very interesting results. Yesterday, after work, I tuned a Kimball Viennese Grand - one of those that was present at the 1984 Olympics gig. My tuning record had evidently been removed for some reason or another, so I had to remeasure the SAT numbers. Well, I guess due to the arrangement of the plate struts being in a different location than I'm accustomed to and I didn't pay very close attention, or perhaps because this was a 5 o'clock tuning after an already taxing day, or I really don't know what it was, but by accident, I measured C5, rather than C6. I didn't realize I had done it until I had tuned all the way up to C5. The only reason I noticed it then, was that I had had to tap the bridge pin to eliminate the false beat so I could measure the string, and I realized then, at that point that it was C5 that I had measured for the FAC rather than C6. Hmm. It worked anyway. The stretch for C (at C5) was something like 7.8, which was in line with the other two measurements, so no warning bells had gone off. All the octaves sounded very clean, and there didn't seem to be any problem with intervals anywhere. The client was due for choir rehearsal at 6:30, so I was pressed for time, and decided to keep going and finish, rather than start completely over. Piano sounded great, maybe even better than I remember previous tunings sounding. I wonder what other accidents might be interesting to experiment with. That's a very good piano by the way. Wish more Kimballs in my client base were like it. Speaking of tuning records, do any of you use the PTG tuning records? Do you find that clients apparently don't like them and they're rarely there when you go back? Is it because they are so large? Jeff Jeff Tanner, RPT School Of Music University of South Carolina
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC