[CAUT] SAT numbers

[Avery Todd]

Joe, I do that when I can't get a clear reading on F to get my "number". I
never thought that would be necessary if the display was clear. Hmmm.

Avery Todd

On 8/17/07, Joe And Penny Goss <imatunr at srvinet.com> wrote:
>
>  hi Avery. Bad reading. Try plucking the string.
> Sometimes I think it is the hammer that is drawing the next octave up that
> is fooling the mic.
> Joe Goss RPT
> Mother Goose Tools
> imatunr at srvinet.com
> www.mothergoosetools.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Avery Todd <ptuner1 at gmail.com>
> *To:* College and University Technicians <caut at ptg.org>
> *Sent:* Friday, August 17, 2007 7:41 PM
> *Subject:* [CAUT] SAT numbers
>
>
> List,
>
> I have a question about high numbers on F on an SAT III. I tuned two Pearl
> River UP 115's today (studio size) and one of them had an F number of 15.1and the other had
> 14.9. I was getting way too much stretch as I went into the bass so I just
> ended up tuning them aurally!
>
> I seem to remember that someone (Fred Sturm?) mentioned some time back
> that he never uses a number higher than ?????. Am I correct? Or was it
> someone else? Just wondering what others of you SAT users do in a case like
> this. BTW, this is a VERY good reason why it's good to also be able to tune
> aurally!!!!!!! :-)
>
> Avery Todd
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20070818/de1f1f50/attachment.html