[CAUT] SAT numbers

Avery Todd ptuner1 at gmail.com
Fri Aug 24 12:24:03 MDT 2007


Sorry, I hit the wrong button.

On 8/24/07, Avery Todd <ptuner1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> David,
>
> Neither have I. :-( I'd just rather do it aurally!
>

Avery


>  On 8/24/07, David Ilvedson <ilvey at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >
> >  Avery,
> >  Couldn't you use the Double Octave feature to bring the stretch in?
> > Seems to me a few negative notches might bring it into line...I have to
> > admit I've not really explored the DO feature...
> >
> > David Ilvedson, RPT
> > Pacifica, CA 94044
> >
> >
> >  ------------------------------
> > Original message
> > From: "Avery Todd"
> > To: "College and University Technicians"
> > Received: 8/17/2007 6:41:52 PM
> > Subject: [CAUT] SAT numbers
> >
> > List,
> >  I have a question about high numbers on F on an SAT III. I tuned two
> > Pearl River UP 115's today (studio size) and one of them had an F number of
> > 15.1 and the other had 14.9. I was getting way too much stretch as I
> > went into the bass so I just ended up tuning them aurally!
> >  I seem to remember that someone (Fred Sturm?) mentioned some time back
> > that he never uses a number higher than ?????. Am I correct? Or was it
> > someone else? Just wondering what others of you SAT users do in a case like
> > this. BTW, this is a VERY good reason why it's good to also be able to tune
> > aurally!!!!!!! :-)
> >  Avery Todd
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20070824/8afa4a04/attachment.html 


More information about the caut mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC