[CAUT] RE : huge pitch raise question

[Michelle Stranges]

Here's proof I am not a wimp..

(you'll love this, Skolnik...)

On Jan 11, 2007, at 4:42 PM, David Skolnik wrote:

> Michelle
>
> Now there, don't get bent. That was "child", as in "honey-child".   
> That, and your tender years, or ears.
>
> As far as WIMP, well, if you want to really dispel that  
> appellation, you could go to the limit with Ed Sutton's advice:
>
>> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:35:16 -0500 (EST)
>> From: ed440 at mindspring.com
>> Subject: Re: [CAUT] huge pitch raise question
>>
>> A good experiment is to intentionally break strings on a piano  
>> that's going to be junked. WEAR EYE PROTECTION.  Tune a string as  
>> unison with it's upper neighbor, and the next  upper neighbor, and  
>> the next....
>
> You can really show'um...pull up those strings on a good piano, and  
> don't wear eye protection. Yeah, now who's a wimp, eh?
>
> David S
> Urtext edition. All smilies expunged
>
>
>
>
>
> At 10:41 AM 1/11/2007, you wrote:
>> Awwright now.
>> That's it..
>>
>> So far I've been called "jerk", now "child" and someone very
>> important in this group (and to me) even called me a... (prepare
>> yourself..)  WIMP.
>>
>> :(
>>
>> I will only admit to being a jerk- and there's PLENTY of you on here
>> I see.
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20070111/3786a5fd/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Photo 3.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 80599 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20070111/3786a5fd/attachment-0001.jpg