----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Nossaman" <rnossaman at cox.net> To: "College and University Technicians" <caut at ptg.org> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 6:14 PM Subject: Re: [CAUT] killer half-octave > Ron Overs wrote: >> Hello Don and all, >> >> I have a clue as to ". . . why this happened". After considering the >> structure of these belly rails, I would be very concerned about >> connecting such a tension device. In my workshop, the solution to this >> soundboard-perimeter-support-stiffness problem has been to ditch the >> 'bell' and fit an extra back beam in the treble. > > Absolutely, Ron. In addition to the brace, I also put one or two 5/8" > steel bars through the front of the belly rail, and back into the rim for > further bracing and mass loading. They're epoxied into both the belly > rail, and the rim. It makes a substantial difference. In any case, the > bell goes. > > Ron N The "bell" is a plate nose bolt support, right? Any thoughts on why that original design used an expensive casting rather than an extra beam? Ease of assembly? --Cy--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC