We are very fortunate to have talented and creditable techs at both ends of this spectrum. Even if it comes to be that some middle ground is what prevails long term, as I expect, look at what we have learned in the process! Deep down those with strong feelings one way or the other hopefully can agree on that. May that spirit and discussion of challenging ideas we saw take root in our organization maybe 10-15 years ago... continue. From the experiments I tried with M-'s leadless (or even near leadless) method there was too much first inertia to feel comfortable, or perhaps just too different from what most players are familiar with. The beauty of Stanwood's approach is that is the ideas are sound and applicable to any weight range of hammers. We have seen the presentation and marketing of ideas change profoundly in PTG over the past 10+ years however, for reasons I don't pretend to understand. It is what it is, and I suppose you can't fault people for trying to maximize income. cheers, Dennis Johnson St. Olaf College
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC