> >.. although it may not support quite so great a Nose Elevation >> Angle on the part of the player :-) >> > oh my - those are words to quote you by! Didn't even use the "s" word either... (supercilious). > I have the pleasure of work with a D and a SD in a hall down here. The > SD literally blows the doors off the D, but there's that nose angle > thingee.... > > I'm willing to bet if you took the fallboard off both of them and asked > any reputable player to sample both, the SD would win hands down. The D > had the Hammers changed about 10 years ago. the SD('74) is original. The only thing problematic about the D is that gang front termination piece, and I think that should be curable (haven't had the chance to try it on a D yet, though the SD worked great). Either piano is improvable, and the D more so than the SD, I'd think. Just needs some rearrangement. Let me modefile it for you Ken. I think I can improve it's acceptance rating. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC