Hi I would like to echo Alan McCoys post. If you know Stanwood protocols then do a few samples so we can get a better idea of the actions actual working ratio. Otherwise, aside of doing a perfect regulation and checking for and eliminating all sources of frictions that are hidden from a static up and down weight measurement. A classic one of these are sticky key bushings/pins that have lots of side play. Polish keypins, and teflon the bushings if they are hanging up on sideplay. A very quick way of increasing leverage, and very reversable as well.. is to take a strips of flange paper.. say 0.2 mm thick, and insert them under balance rail punchings along the back edge of the balance rail pins. This increases the leverage significantly and will effectively reduce the ratio a fair amount. Your downweight of 50s and upweights just under 30 indicates a roughly 40-42 gram balance weight at most I would suspect.... not exactly heavy really. But then BW tells only a small part of the touchweight story of a given action Cheers RicB Hi List, I have a customer who wants his 1975 Baldwin 6'8" grand to feel lighter. It was virtually unused for many years and recently had an action reconditioning and regulation. It weighed off pretty reasonable. Downweight averaged low 50's to 50 and upweight averaged upper 20's to 30. Friction seemed low if anything. There isn't a lot of lead in the keys, as much as four weights in some of the lower bass. The hammers have enough "extra" material in the cove to remove some in an arc shape. I'm wondering if doing only that would result in enough weight loss to make much difference. Has anyone done this procedure not in conjunction with leading, etc. and received good results? Sorry if you already received this. I tried to send this message yesterday from a different source computer and don't know if it went out. :) Thanks, -- Jeff Farris Piano Technician School of Music UT Austin mailto; jfarris at mail.utexas.edu 512-471-0158
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC