Hi Chris I wonder if you might expound a bit on how a player can kinetically feel less friction at the capstan whippen interface. I'd agree that any reduction in friction either there or at the roller / jack interface is a good thing... but I'm having a difficult time pondering how a even upto a gram of weight difference sitting on the capstan can be experienced as a reduction in friction visa vi a gram difference in strike weight being felt in terms of the jacks interreaction with the roller. I would be cool indeed to have a set of Stanwood numbers on this piano. Either there is a good (read <<usual>>) reason why the pianist senses heavyness... and from what we have it really doesnt look like it, or the fellow just plain wants feather play. What I see so far is low friction (in all regards) reasonably low static DW/UW and low mass levels (infered from apparently low key leads and the resultant BW). I'd like to know if the leverage is (after Stanwood) to low (read ratio to high) for the SW's--- despite the seeming light touch action. In anycase... lightening this further is going to quickly run into to low an UW without further ado. I got the drift he was saying well below 30 UW... as in round 26-27 myself. Cheers RicB Ric and all, the real reduction here could be felt by the player kinetically as less friction at the capstan wippen profile, although you will find a reduction in static friction component as well. Just removing weight is one way, adding an assist spring to the wippen is another more influential way. But to be clear about this particular issue I am discussing theory for the most part and agree with Jim Ellis and Don Maninno that other issues are more practically persued and in fact there may not be ANY problem here. Afterall we don't know the Ratio and most Baldwins are high and to have achieved 52 down and 30 up with minimal friction seems a wonderful result to this old Baldwin kicker. Chris Solliday
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC