[CAUT] Uniform Formal Education (Jeff Tanner)

[David Ilvedson]

There is always another way to do any test.   What is the point?   Will countless more hours improve anything?   I doubt it.   Personally, I'll stick with Dr. Al and the CTE's and their countless hours if you don't mind.  Out of curiosity, how is the North Bennet Street School tuning test administered?   How about the Meister Piano tuning test?   I would bet you get X amount of time to do your best aural tuning and then some/persons judge it somehow.   



David Ilvedson, RPT

Pacifica, CA 94044









Original message

From: "Willem Blees" 

To: cy at shusterpiano.com, caut at ptg.org

Received: 10/23/2007 11:56:16 AM

Subject: Re: [CAUT] Uniform Formal Education (Jeff Tanner)





 Tuning the middle two octaves aurally does in no way make one an RPT, either. With all due respect to Dr. Al and the CTE's who've spent countless hours developing the tuning exam, there are other ways we can test one's ability to tune aurally, other than setting a temperament. I have some ideas, but that's not what I'm promoting here. We first need to accept that there are other ways to test aural tuning ability. Once we've reached that consensus, then we can proceed. Sorry if this is turning political, which should be avoided on this list. I'm just reacting to the thread. 



Willem (Wim) Blees, RPT

Piano Tuner/Technician

Honolulu, HI

Author of 

The Business of Piano Tuning

available from Potter Press

www.pianotuning.com





-----Original Message-----

From: Cy Shuster <cy at shusterpiano.com>

To: College and University Technicians <caut at ptg.org>

Sent: Tue, Oct 23 1:34 AM

Subject: Re: [CAUT] Uniform Formal Education (Jeff Tanner)





The RPT requirement for setting a temperament aurally was the tipping point in my decision to advance beyond an ETD-dependent tuner, who never replaced a string (not even plain wire), and move north to Boston for a year to go to NBSS. 

 

As a player, a feel sure that my TuneLab tunings were good, and I did aural unisons, but they weren't stable. And now I can truly maintain an instrument, not just pitch raise. And I really know how to use TuneLab now! 

 

--Cy-- 

 

----- Original Message ----- From: "Israel Stein " <custos3 at comcast.net> 

To: <caut at ptg.org> 

Cc: <caut-request at ptg.org> 

Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 3:36 PM 

Subject: [CAUT] Uniform Formal Education (Jeff Tanner) 

 

> On Monday, October 22, 2007 11:01:44 AM Jeff Tanner wrote: 

> 

>>Taking the RPT exams does not make anyone a better piano technician. It >>simply evaluates his/her skills. 

> 

> Jeff, 

> 

> Well, not exactly. The prospect of facing the exams often motivates > technicians to significantly upgrade their skills. Taking the exams often > does motivate people to become better technicians and does contribute to > their understanding of what exactly some of this work is all about... > People learn an awful lot when fworking under pressure... 

> 

> Otherwise, an excellent post. 

> 

> Israel Stein 

> 

> 

>  







Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20071023/bc29c588/attachment.html