There have been several articles written through the years on this subject. One in particular I remember deals with the B +/- discussion quite a bit. There was some credence in that article given to the thought that the jack could be just a very slight bit off perpendicular so as to rotate through the friction moment... but still the window here is quite small. In anycase, moving the whippen rail is a matter of creating this alignment and not a matter of changing touch weight. But to the question ric posses. Assuming a given blow distance yields a hammer shank angle at rest, which then in turn yields a jack angle (and whippen spread) at rest. The position of the whippen center then also becomes <<fixed>> and your whippen cushion height can be changed to meet the capstan so that they satisfy the magic line between the whippen center and balance rail pin. I suppose an enlightened enough person could use this to change the required key dip to achieve good letoff, drop, jack travel, etc for a given blow if one felt the need to change key dip... hadnt thought along these lines but it seems on the surface of it reasonable. Too early in the day to ponder this and I have piles of stuff what needs doing, but this is worth some thought I suppose. Cheers RicB >Another question, is it best to have the jack start out at 90 degrees to the >shank, or is it better to have the jack pass through 90 degrees to the shank >at, say, half blow. I think it's more advantageous to have the jack center aligned on a perpendicular line from the shank at the knuckle core. There was a series of Journal articles a few years back on "Action Elevations" which touched on this. Regards, Jon Page
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC