Okay, I guess if somebody says that having no cantilever, and longer back scale, is "better" and that this is something that should be accepted as a "fact" I get the impression that it implies that everyone else is wrong <G>. No big deal, I really admire and prefer the attitude that constantly challenges assumptions and authority. But sometimes there are dangers lurking in having "proven" the other side wrong. Granted, the pro-cantilever crowd justify their design on false premises: "it puts the bearing out in a more resonant part of the soundboard;" "it allows for longer string length, which obviously is to be preferred." This is twaddle, as you have very ably pointed out. But that doesn't necessarily make shorter back length and cantilever a bad design feature per se. Lots of people do the "right" thing for the "wrong" reason - and vice versa <G>. Regards, Fred Sturm University of New Mexico fssturm at unm.edu On Apr 29, 2008, at 5:10 PM, Ron Nossaman wrote: > >> But Ric is also right, in telling Jim and Ron that their opinion >> based on experience doesn't make everybody else wrong. > > Where did either Jim or I say that everybody else was wrong, and why > is it so inevitably phrased and misrepresented that way? > > Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC