I would like that first sentence a lot better if it read: "The energy from the string, which doesn't have enough [surface area] to move very much air, is transferred to the soundboard which does." The soundboard is not increasing the volume of sound--it is creating the sound. So, I'd like the second sentence better if it read: "So the ... volume of sound is [high] because the soundboard, whose total energy output is less than what the string started with, is ... efficient at moving ... air even [though] energy [has been lost in the process]." ddf | -----Original Message----- | From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On | Behalf Of David Love | Sent: May 07, 2009 10:44 PM | To: caut at ptg.org | Subject: Re: [CAUT] Accujust and grunting fish bait | | The energy from the string which doesn't have enough mass to | move very much air is transferred to the soundboard which | does. So the increased volume of sound is because the | soundboard, whose total energy output is less than what the | string started with, is more efficient at moving more air | even with less energy. It's not really amplified in the same | what that, say, an electric guitar is amplified. But the | soundboard does make the vibrating string louder, just not | amplified. Terminology issue. The vocal cord thing and | creating an area in the throat that produces some resonance | is something slightly different again. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut_ptg.org/attachments/20090508/636a7fba/attachment.html>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC