[CAUT] Semantics

Keith Roberts keithspiano at gmail.com
Wed May 13 07:11:05 MDT 2009


On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:21 AM, <afmamh7 at bellsouth.net> wrote:

> I am not an acoustician, but I think it is incorrect to consider sound and
> vibration as two different types of energy.  Sound IS vibration.
>
>

> Sound is not vibration. Sound is an impulse that is a wave of air. It
> leaves from it's point of origin and never goes back unless acted upon by
> another force. It is confusing that it does have frequency and amplitude.
> Take the wave pattern caused by dropping a rock in a pond. The resultant
> waves have direction, amplitude and frequency but we don't call it
> vibration. Sound originates from a point source and disperses in the same
> manner as the water waves do.



> In vibration, the energy returns and crosses the center line of origin.
> Back and forth motion is vibration.


Keith Roberts
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20090513/8637894f/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC