[CAUT] A=440 once again

G Cousins cousins_gerry at msn.com
Tue Nov 10 17:12:05 MST 2009


432?
Let em eat Harpsichord!
GC

To: caut at ptg.org
From: pwilliams4 at unlnotes.unl.edu
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:11:38 -0600
Subject: Re: [CAUT] A=440 once again

I say "no"! The piano will NOT
be brought down to 432..Sorry!



Paul










From:
"Richard Adkins" <RADKINS at coe.edu>

To:
<caut at ptg.org>

Date:
11/10/2009 08:53 AM

Subject:
Re: [CAUT] A=440 once again








http://www.schillerinstitute.org/music/revolution.html

 

some folks want to go to A-432!

 

What do you do then???!!!

 

(I don't think this is going to fly, but occassionally
you do see a performance

at "Verdi" pitch, pitched.)

 

Either way, owners of instruments pitched at A-440 are
going to have to modify or

buy new instruments to perform at other pitches.

 

I am thinking of pitching our concert grands at A-441
because they often go down

in pitch when the lights come on. When I do my touch ups
after a rehearsal, then

the pianos are a bit flat, like A=439.6. :-] And you know,
people will talk about

that sort of thing. (LOL). I could go on and on, but I
won't.

 

Richard Adkins

Coe College Music Dept.



 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20091110/f5c56db3/attachment.htm>


More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC