[CAUT] Hailun & Suzuki vs. Yamaha

Ron Nossaman rnossaman at cox.net
Sun Aug 29 16:07:33 MDT 2010


  On 8/29/2010 11:47 AM, Fred Sturm wrote:
>
>     The people from purchasing can hardly be blamed - how and on what 
> basis could they check his claim? I don't know of any way to "spec" 
> pianos in a meaningful way on a bid request. It is possible to load 
> the dice by specifying "diaphragmatic soundboard," ABS plastic action 
> parts, or the like, but that kind of spec only steers towards one 
> specific brand. With state institutions, this is a real problem.
> Regards,
> Fred Sturm


This is the universal and eternal problem for any of us in a position of 
needing to buy something without sufficient or trustworthy specific 
information necessary to make an intelligent choice. We can blindly rely 
on questionably qualified (trusted) opinions of others, try to get past 
marketing hype to obtain information we're not likely technically 
capable of understanding anyway (assuming any such information is 
available anywhere), or try to minimize the disaster potential by 
guessing wrong at a lower rather than a higher cost (cost/risk). As long 
as potential information sources continue to pass on rumor or fantasy as 
truth, ignorantly repeat obviously outlandish claims as factual, and 
outright lie for their own short term gain, this will be the case. This 
situation so far gives every indication that it will outlast the species.
  Ron N



More information about the CAUT mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC