The action is so thoroughly trashed that assessing the sound is ...hmmm...difficult. I'd say it is mostly unremarkable and uninspiring. But like assessing any old piano, where do you assign blame!? I kinda figured it was a feature implemented to deal with a weak area of the board. I have to admit though that tuning this was not as difficult (except for string lag throughout, but that's a different issue, and one among many :-( ) as I had expected after seeing the bridge. Alan ________________________________ From: Ed Sutton <ed440 at mindspring.com> Reply-To: Ed Sutton <ed440 at mindspring.com>, CAUTlist <caut at ptg.org> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:40:20 -0800 To: CAUTlist <caut at ptg.org> Subject: Re: [CAUT] Baldwin D bridge This was done on some Baldwin and also some Steinway pianos, D's that I know of. The theory was, I believe, that the inevitable out-of-tune partials would improve the sustain. How does it sound? Ed Sutton ----- Original Message ----- From: McCoy, Alan <mailto:amccoy at ewu.edu> To: ">College and University Technicians <caut at ptg.org> <mailto:caut at ptg.org> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 2:35 PM Subject: [CAUT] Baldwin D bridge Has anyone seen this before? These pics (not great quality, but what can you expect from a phone, ;-)) are of a Baldwin D #141772. The top bridge section is notched normally, with the notch parallel to the capo. The mid treble bridge section is notched such that the bridge pins are in line with the bridge and at an angle to the capo. Then the notching returns to normal in the tenor section. What were they trying to achieve? Alan -- Alan McCoy, RPT Eastern Washington University amccoy at ewu.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut.php/attachments/20101116/31ecea5e/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC