> I meant to suggest this before but even though we are not a union >there ought to be a way that we can effectively and diplomatically >communicate that message to Baylor. We should not endorse an unreasonable >position. If Baylor has still not admitted this or even figured it out, >then the message needs to come from outside. We at least owe this to Danny >Boone. I agree with the sentiment here, though I don't know what we could do. It seems to me that the best "free market" solution is that quality people place an appropriate value on thier services and stick with it. There is a similar situation here in Washington State. Though the position here is Civil Service and therefore audited and protected, one of our regional universitys has their position set at 49% which exempts them from having to pay _any_ benefits. That's bad enough for their part, but why would any self respecting craftsman give in to that baloney and work for the pathetic hourly wage with no compensating benifits? As long as some will, these adminisrators will take advantage of it. Mark Mark Story, RPT Eastern Washington University | mstory@ewu.edu Cheney, Washington, USA | mark.story@phunnet.org
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC