Dip vs. Leverage (was Re: RE light action (help))

[Steven J. Richardson]

I agree; 3/8 of a foot is a problem in terms of dip.
How do you do those fast glissandos...?

;-)

Steve Richardson
==
  >From pianotech@byu.edu Tue Jan 23 12:19:11 1996
  >Received: from merit.edu (merit.edu [35.1.1.42]) by home.merit.edu (8.7.3/merit-2.0) with
ESMTP id MAA28416 for <sjr@home.merit.edu>; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 12:19:11 -0500 (EST)
  >Received: from acs2.byu.edu (pmdf@acs2.byu.edu [128.187.22.132]) by merit.edu
(8.7.3/merit-2.0) with ESMTP id MAA05533 for <sjr@merit.edu>; Tue, 23 Jan 1996 12:19:07 -0500
(EST)
  >Received: from acs2.byu.edu (server@localhost)
  > by ACS2.BYU.EDU (PMDF V5.0-5 #11414) id <0DLN98762000FA@ACS2.BYU.EDU>; Tue,
  > 23 Jan 1996 10:14 -0700 (MST)
  >Date: Tue, 23 Jan 1996 10:14:31 -0700 (MST)
  >From: Newton Hunt <nhunt@rci.rutgers.edu>
  >Subject: Re: Dip vs. Leverage (was Re: RE light action (help))
  >Sender: pianotech@byu.edu
  >To: Multiple recipients of list <pianotech@byu.edu>
  >Errors-to: reevesj@byugate.byu.edu
  >Reply-to: pianotech@byu.edu
  >Message-id: <9601231212.ZM12201@niflheim.rutgers.edu>
  >Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
  >Precedence: bulk
  >Originator: pianotech@byu.edu
  >X-Listprocessor-version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
  >Status: R
  >
  >David,
  >   My problem is the 3/8', not .375".
  >   All dip blocks should be mic'ed at each front corner to determine it's
  >actual deminisions.  I have seen blocks stamped 3/8" and actually mic'ed
  >greater than .400".
  >   Dip should be done across the front edges of the keys, after the
  >block's thickness is varified.
  >         Newton
  >         nhunt@rci.rutgers.edu
  >