At 09:41 AM 3/7/96 -0700, you wrote: >My apologies, I see that I have offended some by making unkind remarks about >anothers level of competence. As a new subscriber to this newsgroop, I had >guessed that a few of the questions that I responded to were fictious in >order to evoke certain responses, perhaps humorous or otherwise, and to spur >discussion. It is true that the only stupid question is one that is not >asked, and I certainly have asked my share. (Except, some of the questions >really are dumb...) I'M ONLY KIDDING! Lighten up you guys. > Lisa, I personally was not offended by your remarks, and you are right I did intend to spur on discussion, serious discussion. Thank you for your enlightened contribution. However I was surprised to see so little response to such a controversial subject. I do have an understanding of proper "accepted" regulation methods but sometimes we must throw these aside to get the immediate job done. I was first introduced to unusual procedures "privately" by Loyd Whitcomb when I attended Yamaha's Little red schoolhouse in 1987. I at first thought he was joking but since then I heard from concert technicians who also in certain instances used this method. I had thought that this forum would be a proper place to explore all the aspects of this "living on the edge" methodology. Thank you Bob Davis, Vince, and Jim Harvey for your contributions Bob, Robert S. Bussell RPT Indianapolis In. rbussell@iquest.net
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC