--snip > Dean observed that a given "hammer blow strength" might generate > greater amplitude in a single string with the other two muted compared to > the amplitude of all three strings excited by an equal blow - that more of > the force of the blow would be focused on one string, and that this might > account for the pitch difference between single and three string unisons. I > think that is the most satisfctory explanation I have heard, but I don't see > why the SAT wouldn't pick it up. --snip The hammer is still striking 3 strings even when 2 are muted. The energy is going in to all the strings, it's just that the energy from two of them is being dissipated by the mute. I really think the 1 singing string doesn't get any more energy in either case. dave _______________________________________________ David M. Porritt, RPT Meadows School of the Arts Southern Methodist University Dallas, Texas _______________________________________________
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC