Dear Ed, and dear List(eners) I will gladly and very carefully repeat what I told here before. Actually, it was like this: One day during my last course at the Piano technical Academy, I was = busy with a CFIIIS. My teacher, a fantastic! and very famous senior tuner/technician = called Tsuji-San, gave me some instructions about the "making of = tone" and tone refinement. On that day he gave me a lesson about tone quality, how to improve = tone through tuning and string adjustment. Then, afterwards, he sort = of hesitated, started to smile and told me to find some tones that = sounded softer or.. not as strong sounding as the rest. clear neh? He then ordered me to pull out the action and put it on a nearby = bench. He >gently< pushed down one of the weaker sounding keys so that the = hammer slowly made it's drop. plock...hammerdrop! He kept the key pushed down. In that position the hammer is not checked by the backcheck but just = resting on the bridge. Now..he told me to look at the very lower end of the hammer tail = and..at the same time at the very upper part of the backcheck. He asked me this question: "how much space, how many mm.(darn euro's) = is/are there between hammer tail and backcheck? I looked carefully, = and told him I saw about say 4 mm space. Then he took out a ebony hardwood pipe with a rectangular hole in it, = he put the pipe over the backcheck and turned the pipe around to the = left about two times. In other words: he screwed the backcheck up with to complete turns. get it? Then he asked me again "how much space, how many mm. is/are there = between hammer tail and backcheck? I looked carefully, and told him I = saw about say 2 mm space. Now, he told me to put the action back, readjust the turned up = backchecks and also make sure that the hammers would not make the = slightest contact with the backchecks. (by putting one of your hands on the top of the hammers and with the = other hand depressing the keys. If you push a little on the hammers = while moving the keys up and down you might feel contact between = backchecks and hammer tails so you know that you make the hammer = check bigger. If you do this exactly right, the distance will be = accurate and perfect {after allready having made a perfect = regulation!}) Now my teacher asked me to compare the treated (formerly weaker) = toneswith the rest: lo and behold!! They were just as strong!! I asked him immediately: how can this be? what happened? He smiled, = shrugged his shoulders and said that he could not explain. He did tell me however that the perfect space between hammer tail and = backcheck should always be >2 mm<. I do not think that I can tell this event more clearly. This is = exactly how it happened and I have used the trick many times. As long = as there is enough space to make a change, you will have a result. Be = careful! if the backcheck is too high on the metal thread and you = make attempts to rotate the backcheck down, there is the possibillity = of killing the thread and the backcheck. So don't go too far, you will hear the wood groaning. I have now explained my little story a couple of times. Everybody = thinks that I am so stupid as not to have checked whether the hammer = touches the backcheck! Allthough I look basically OK.. I am very dumb....but not that bad. Check it out. If one of you can give a decent explanation, another mystery will = have been solved and we will all blow the horns, raise our flags and = receive shiny medals! > I am starting to wonder if I am reading this right. Voicing by >backcheck? >I have not been able to tell a difference in tonal strength or = composition by >moving the backcheck to different positions, UNTIL I get it close enough = to >drag on the tail as the hammer launches. Once clear of that, I find no >difference in sound. > > Might I respectfully ask that we are given a more specific = description > than "the sound is stronger"? and under what type of play? I was once >faced with a real repetition freak, only way he was happy was with the >hammers checking way up by the string. The next teacher to use the studio >complained about there being little power on fast repetitions. > Is it possible that the lost of power(tone, 'stronger sound', = whatever >it is that is changing), is because there is a effectivly a very short = blow >distance on all but the first note struck? > > > >Best regards, >Ed Foote friendly greetings from: Andr=E9 Oorebeek CONCERT PIANO SERVICE Amsterdam, the Netherlands email: oorebeek@euronet.nl =83 where MUSIC is no harm can be =83
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC