Research

[Leslie W Bartlett]

Mr Bryant-

Well, after all folks have things to do, places to be, thoughts to think,
and important e-mail to sort out.  How dare you clutter it up which
thank-you's and other positive
considerations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??????????????????????
 After all, it must be important that these folks read only the
'relevent' stuff, and only stuff which applies to THEM is relevent.....
Of course, when these Yahoos want to talk about God, and heavenly
Jerusalem, lambasting Mr Marshall because he didn't wipe his rear end in
just the correct manner, its is tantamount that WE use our time to read
their drivel.....

I do wonder, however, who they had to complain to and about before the
miracle of e-mail gave them such a large platform from which to
pontificate.....

When one sees a pile of S***, s/he doesn't need to sit in it, and when
one sees the same on the e-mail, s/he isn't required to sit in it either.
 Did I thank you for thanking me for whatever I did-  I think it was
answer your two questions in a really ignorant manner.  If not, thank you
for thanking me- and notice I DIDN'T MAIL THIS TO THE "LIST" AND THUS
POLLUTE THE AIRWAVES WITH PERSONAL THANK-YOU'S.

Probably it'd be best if you didn't unsubscribe.  It would more unfairly
balance the ratio of decents-to-idiots in favor of the idiots.

Leslie Bartlett M. Mus
Houston Chapter PTG
lesbart@juno.com

On Sat, 22 Feb 1997 11:59:01 -0500 (EST) JIMRPT@aol.com writes:
>Frank;
> I have already apologized for not being more diligent in my
>addressing the
>personal thank yous. In order not to disturb the pianotech line any
>further I
>will unsubscribe. Thank you for bringing my affront to the attention
>of all
>once again.
>Jim Bryant (FL)
>