poor pianos (was Consultation Fees)

David M. Porritt dporritt@post.cis.smu.edu
Sun, 29 Jun 1997 08:39:04 -0700


Ralph:

I understand your feeling about the piano being bad in our view and good
in theirs, unfortunately what I was dealing with was the fact that now
their daughter is in College and wanting to get more serious about her
piano studies and the instrument is severely limited.  They paid $14,000
for it 14 years ago and it is a $1,000.00 piano with a $5,000 finish. 
It obviously suited their needs for 14 years, but now it doesn't.  This
in spite of the fact that they thought the purchase was a "lifetime"
investment in a musical instrument.  For the dealer, it did escape the
warranty period without claims!

I understand that each person has their goals, and their fiscal
limitations that they can live with.  I guess my problem with these
things is that they appear to be so well restored and that implies a
certain quality of work that they don't have.  I'm trying to come up
with an analogy that fits and I can't because there is no other large
purchase that people make where they know so little about the inner
workings.  You couldn't sell me a nicely painted car that doesn't run. 
You can't sell me a beautiful looking computer with an 8088 CPU.  Yet we
see that done in pianos all the time.

Frustrating!

dave
_______________________________________________

David M. Porritt, RPT
Meadows School of the Arts
Southern Methodist University
Dallas, Texas
_______________________________________________


This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC