---------- > From: JElving@aol.com > To: pianotech@byu.edu > Subject: Re: Electronic Tuning Aids > Date: Saturday, May 10, 1997 7:42 PM > >I would stay away from the > Korg. Not only does it not have a way of adding stretch, etc., but I found > that it tends to wander somewhere around true A440. It seems to change every > time you turn it on. > > John Elving, RPT Mine (WT 12) is temperamental like that also, but I found changing the batteries helps even though the battery indicator reads "good" However its "wander" is still within the range of the heat variations of metal forks (IMHO). Checking it with a fork helps as you can do it quickly enough not to have heat transfer from your hand to the fork. When the Musician's Union wanted a pit piano tuned to 441 it satisfied them. I suppose a led type might be "better" given the mechanics of a meter might preclude a wider range of variation. I just found one more way to make it wander besides shaking it, that is take a tuning fork hold it to the mic, then rotate it 90 degrees then rotate it back. It always reads a little flat. Strike it again and hold it up and it reads true, until you rotate it again. Weird because it consistantly does this to the same degree. I mentioned earlier the Scisoco C 523.3 fork doesn't vary, well it does if you hold it for 30 seconds and look really close enough. Richard Moody ps The Korg AT-12 in the APSCO catalogue looks like the one I tried but gave back in favor of the Korg WT 12 (the one with the knob they don't make any more.)The AT has been around for twelve years or more. The MT 1200 looks intreaging.. pps its (AT-12) good enough to show errors of more than one cent in aural temperaments and handy because you don't have to turn a knob for every note, but I didn't like the way the needle moved. esp on upper and lower notes. John is right about stretch, it won't show stretch, but will show how much you did stretch the note.
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC