> Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 03:50:58 -0400 (EDT) > From: BSimon1234@aol.com > Subject: World Class Junk > To: pianotech@byu.edu > Reply-to: pianotech@byu.edu Bill, Sometimes it helps to take readings off other notes around the F and go with that number for the F. I don't think I've ever had a 38 reading...Occassionally I can't get a good pattern on the F from which to read the lights, then I use other notes in the area for the info I need. > This list seems to have an abundance of technicians who seem to, almost > exclusively, tune large Steinways and Baldwins grands every day. That must > be lovely. I hope someone might be able to help me with a world class lousy > piano. > > I have used a SAT for a number of years, quite successfully. Today I > attempted a tuning on a 1965 Hallet Davis spinet. It reliably, repeatedly, > gave FAC numbers of 38.2 - 10.1 - 1.1. > > This translated to a tuning with octaves beating wildly, at about 3 beats per > second. I measured everything many times, measured the stretch of notes next > to the wild notes, tuned aurally and tried to find a FAC setting that matched > a decent octave, experimented with putting "standard" numbers into the SAT > and seeing how the tuning compared. Not even close! I then mused about > adding one cent to the A number to stretch the octaves for pure fifths - ho - > ho - ho ! (:-) > > Forgetting about the cracking bass bridge, the dead bass strings, the > majority of strings that beat wildly, the hard hammers, etc., - what would > you do with a piano like this? No - don't answer that, it is too obvious. > What would you do with a SAT to aid in attempting to tune a piano like this? > > I finally put the SAT away and did a completely aural tuning, and was > underwhelmed with the results. The customer was delighted. > > But really, - what would you do? > > Thanks, > Bill Simon > > ilvey Pacifica, CA ilvey@a.crl.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC