Dear Robert and List Your post is wonderful material for the performer archive format! Along with others, I am constantly learning, and grateful for new perspectives. In the future, please consider utilizing the following format for similar posts. :^) (Print, cutout, and tape to your wall for reference). Sincerely; Garret Traylor -------------------------(cut here)---------------------------------------- Would you like to share information about a piano artist you have worked for? Please consider using the following format as a guideline -- * Subject line of E-mail: Performer Archive (artist name). * Body copy: o performer o performance date o location o special type or name of any instruments o piano serial number o temperament used o program notes o and any other details you would like to share. o edit your story to a modest length (one page preferred). This will be a treasured thread for others to refer to in the future. So take a note pad along and take some brief notes during your work day, then take a little time to put your thoughts, ideas, narratives, tales, and yarns into words .... above all have fun!!! :^) Example: ---------------------------------------------------- Subject: Performer archive: (Terrell, Shawn) ---------------------------------------------------- Mr. Shawn Terrell October 11, 1996 Rosen Concert Hall, Appalachian State University Boone N.C. Steinway Concert & Artist Piano Serial #534 Well Temperament Thomas Young Bach program: Sonatas...… "The story you would like to share." -------------------------(cut here)---------------------------------------- Robert Goodale wrote: > Hi folks.... > > Yesterday I tuned for a duo piano concert featuring renoun Steinway jazz > pianists Ramsey Lewis & Billy Taylor. There evening performance drew a > nearly full house and a very appreciative audiance. To say the least > these pianist were exceptionally pleasant to work with, and had no > complaints regarding the pianos, my tuning, or the regulation/voicing. > Has anyone else out there in cyber-land had the opportunity to tune for > these guys? > > I thought I would bring up an interesting and rather unexpected > observation. The two pianos that were used, both Ds, are new. One is our > house piano, #533099, and the other is a rental from the dealer, > #533755. With the serial numbers so close together I would assume that > they probably left the factory within a few months from each other. > I arrived at the auditorium at 7:00 AM prepared to tune the two pianos > matched together. I have done this before several times, the last time > with Duo pianists Richard and John Contiguglia in Des Moines, and > experienced absolutely no problems. Having these two new pianos with > closely matched serial numbers, I was expecting little difficulty. > Well.... > > The first thing I did was a brief experiment. I took readings from both > pianos with the S.A.T. and discovered significantly different stretch > numbers between the two. Our house "D" measured 7.2, 6.6, and 6.2. The > rental D, however, measured 7.3, 8.3, and 6.0. I then set a 2-octave > temperament on each piano to check for compatibility. While each piano > had a very nice and clean sounding ET with itself, they were noticably > incompatible with each other. Thus turning the keyboards to face each > other, I set sail on an interesting "temperamental journey" compromising > the two to sound good with each other as well as to themselves. The most > observable difference when I finished was some 5ths slightly more narrow > than usual on the rental piano. I don't think anyone else noticed the > variences but me, and as they say it was "close enough for jazz". When I > finished they both sounded quite good together as well as on their own, > but with limited time before they stage crew arrived it did become quite > a race against the clock to get the job done right. > > Now OF COURSE I do typically expect some moderate variences on identical > pianos since no two are truly alike. I was, however, suprised to find a > variance to this degree. In short, I was wondering what other > experiences some of you might have had in matching pianos. Should I have > been suprised by this, or perhaps I have simply been "lucky" in past > experiences? It might be an interesting experiment to take readings from > various "D"s that some of you regularly work on and then post and > compair the stretch numbers. Has anyone run into any worse-case > scenarios where two identical pianos could absolutely not be matched > without obvious differences? > Just curious. > > Rob Goodale, RPT
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC