---------- > From: Anne Beetem <abeetem@wizard.net> > To: pianotech@ptg.org > Subject: Re: Bach & WT vs. ET > Date: Tuesday, March 10, 1998 10:35 AM > Concerning Bach and ET..... > This fallacy has just been republished in the new book, "Music, The Brain, > & Ecstasy" along with various other 20th century misconceptions. > Otherwise it's a great book. I just may contact the author and encourage > a corrected 2nd edition! > > Anne Actually if the term ET is used like the detractors of ET, ie ET can't really be tuned, only approximated, then Bach most probably tuned an approximation. But the problem is, so far no evidence has been found that says exactly what he did, or was attempting to do. The perplexing omission from Well Tempered Clavier or any of his writings of any tuning instructions is the major problem in the histriography of how he actually tuned. Without evidence, to say he did NOT tune ET is as much a fallacy, to say he did tune ET. It boils down to a question of semantics. Only one word is needed to "correct" the "fallacy"... "probably" . Richard The Real Moody
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC