historical et .... RW?

Carl Root rootfamily@erols.com
Sun, 22 Mar 1998 18:21:27 -0500


Billbrpt wrote:
> I still don't believe most people can yet tune a real ET
> although there are many more now than 20 years ago.  It's not that I think ET
> is "wrong", it's just that it is really mostly a concept or a goal that is
> rarely acheived but widely believed in.  When it is acheived, it is perhaps
> not the wrong choice, but probably not the best one, so I believe.  When it is
> believed to be acheived but it is really Reverse Well, that's where the big
> problem is.   Those who believe their RW is ET believe with the greatest faith
> I have ever witnessed.

Why do think so many tuners can't tune ET?  Poor technique, poor
procedure, lack of awareness of the how the temperament is defined? 
I've seen tuners finish a temperament procedure and not run chromatic
intervals.  You've considered, no doubt, that most tuners are working in
an environment where most piano users can't tell the difference.  The
important question may be:  Are the technicians tuning for
discriminating players able to achieve ET?  I'll bet most of them are. 
If they can't, then most of them will not be able to keep the client,
unless they're the only game in town. 

I just signed on to this list so forgive me if I've missed something,
but what is 'Reverse Well'?


This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC