In a message dated 7/27/1999 10:14:55 PM, Rob wrote: <<"You bought it, you deserve to get what you paid for.">> Rob............maybe they did? Having decided years ago to not try to compete with School System bidding, I can sympathize with both sides. From the Schools point of view They want/need to get the best instrument for the lowest possible price and don't mind squeezing a dealer for all the goodie they can get. From the dealers point of view they need to sell at the highest possible price so they can make enough money to stay in business and don't mind squeezing the School system for all the dollars they can get. These two thingees usually don't meet in the middle and something has to give, i.e. smaller instrument, lesser quality, poorer service, etc. Now, a good case can be made for saying that regardless of the price a dealer has the duty to deliver a servicable instrument at the start if he/she decides to make the sale ............and I won't argue with this line of thinking. However on the last school sale here in town, that I am familiar with, the winning(?) dealer quoted a price based on: 1. Instrument delivered straight to schools. 2. No set-up, initial service. 3. No warranty. Not suprisingly there were numerous problems with the pianos as delivered and the school system screamed for service. the dealer pointed to the contract and said they got "exactly" what thay paid for and that he would be happy to service these instrments for XX dollars per unit, provide warranty service for XX dollars per unit and there the matter rests. This may not be the case with Cynthia Ann's piano but it is a possibility that cannot be overlooked unfortunately. Another view. Jim Bryant (FL)
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC