>Exactly my point. Personally, tho not an accomplished rebuilder myself, I have not >seen a soundboard that has both too little downbearing and at the same time plenty >of crown. * They're out there. I've seen negative bearing on a board with about 6mm of crown at the longest rib, and between 2 and 3mm in the killer octave. It looked like the plate had just been set too high in the first place, and lowering it a little should work wonders in that piano. If it was one of those where the tension could be dropped and the plate, pinblock, and strings could be lifted out as a unit, it wouldn't have been that hard to do. >Hmm.. I guess I need to be more precise. String deflection at the bridge is measured >before easing off string tension, and then again afterwards. The difference gives a >reading of how much the board rises with tension off. ie. crown. Does this jive with >your meaning of crown ? * Yes, sort of, but I meant crawling underneath with a string and flashlight, stretching the string from rim to rim against the underside of the board - parallel to and between two ribs. The gap between the string and the board in the middle is the crown. If there is no gap, slowly pull one end of the string away from the board and see if the board is flat, or even low in the center (negative crown). Personally, I like to see measurable crown when the strings are still on and under tension. Downbearing force diminishes rapidly as the deflection angle nears zero. If there is very little bearing at tension, and there is no, or negative measurable crown in the board, the board has nothing to give you since it's already flat with only a very light loading. Even if it springs back some when you take the strings off, it doesn't have any load carrying capacity left. If there is very little to zero crown (maybe even a very slight negative crown), and high string deflection angles, the bearing was set too heavy in the first place. If the board springs back to a decent crown when the string tension is taken down, raise the plate or shim under the aliquots and it will probably do well under the more moderate bearing load when you restring it. See how this works? The more a board is deflected, the harder it pushes back. At the same time the string bearing angle that pushed the board down in the first place decreased as the board was deflected, and the lesser resulting angle resulted in a lighter bearing load. It's sort of self correcting, within limits. At a certain point, equilibrium is reached. Setting bearing is the process of trying to pre determine where that equilibrium point will occur and what the resulting crown, deflection, and bearing angle will be. If the bearing is set so that, *if* you were to force the bridge down by clamps or weight (but don't do it) until the soundboard was flat, and the resulting string deflection angle wasn't over zero, there would be no way the downbearing could push the board below flat in actual use. I hope this makes sense. I'm pretty helpless at trying to explain most things without pencil and paper, and lots of hand gestures (gesticulating wildly, occasionally scratching, often befuddled). Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC