I found it! (nit-pik)

[Robert Goodale]

>
>
> 12-15 frames per second would speed things up a little and I don't think
> you want time lapse photography here. 100-200 fps would be fast enough to
> show what you want.  Real high speed stuff is more than 1000 fps. (sorry I
> can't recall specific fps off the top-o-head)

Sorry.... I what I meant was 12,000-15,000 fps.  This would require a rotating
prism-type camera. (I studied cinematography for three years but became a
piano tech. Go figure).

>
> Re: cats and socks - that's what both are trained to do.....

Don't forget...  The "First Cat" (Whitehouse) is named "Socks"!

Rob Goodale, RPT