Seems to be a bit of confusion over these terms... "strikeweight" "strikedistance" and "blow distance". Gets a bit difficult to know what we are talking about when at times. Blow distance I think we are all on the same plane on.. Strike distance seems to be used in two contexts.. And strike weight is a a term I have not come across yet, and it seems clear I should be aware of it. I wish someone would clearly and completely define (expound upon) this term. Please ??? <grin> Richard Brekne I.C.P.T.G. N.P.T.F. Bergen, Norway " > > Reducing strikeweight has a direct relation to touchweight to the degree > > of action leverage (Strike Ratio). On a 5:1 ratio, reducing SW by 1 gr > > reduces Touchweight by 5gr. Weight has no bearing on aftertouch. > > Aftertouch is a product of geometry and regulation. > > My question had to do with strike distance, not strike weight. When > Kristinn proposed reducing strike distance, I think he also had in mind > to compensate with key dip and all the other adjustments. As far as I > can see, that would only make for shallower dip and reduced dynamics and > not change the weight at all. I agree that the best way to reduce > touchweight is often to reduce strike weight, depending upon other > factors. > > Paul S. Larudee, RPT > Richmond, CA
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC