Kent Swafford wrote: > > Stephen Birkett wrote: > > >Well quite a spate of historical piano letters we've had here recently. > >The above are definitely not mutually exclusive. It is quite feasible to > >have an histroically accurate 1850 restored piano that is fully > >functional and useful. Can I ask is this over-strung? > > > >Stephen > > Sure, it's over-strung. > > I figure it isn't really my place to say after the fact that it was a bad > thing to modernize the appearance of a piano; it might be my place to say > that such modernization had been done poorly, but this had been done > beautifully. (I might have recommended against the modernization had I > been asked before it was done, especially if that early serial number is > for real.) > > Kent If it's really that early it would have to have agraffes all the way up instead of a V-bar. It seems rather obvious, but since it hasn't been mentioned until now, which is it? Paul S. Larudee, RPT Richmond, CA
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC